Category: Uncategorized

  • The Undreamer 3.0

    “It’s 2084 — sleeping is keeping you poor!” Garret Glover grinned at the 50 megapixel front camera of his mounted iPhone 27, which he was live-streaming from. He glanced at his personal phone and checked the content brief from NoSleep:

    • Catchy opening line. Suggestion: In the year 2084, sleep is for the poor!
    • Explain how the unDreamer 3.0 has benefited you. Suggested focus: increased time for productivity at home and on the go, dream + memory tracking benefits.
    • Demonstrate the product, highlighting key features: MemoryLock and DreamDecoder.
    • Catchy closing line. Suggestion: Don’t let sleep stop you from building your dream life!
    • Dress code: business professional. Khakis and polo shirt preferred.
    • Target audience: young, ambitious professionals.
    • Tone: eager achiever.


    Garret looked at the thin, black, yoga-mat-like ‘bed’ on the floor behind him (roll it up and take it on the go!) and the neurofiber silk pillowcase covering his pillow (pillow not included!). He had to admit, they looked cheap. For $999, NoSleep could have at least released a couple of color options. But it synced with the neurochip installed in his hypothalamus, and that was all that mattered. He looked back at the camera. His view counter was at a whopping 7 people.


    “I’m telling y’all, I’ve been a NoSleeper from the start. They’ve gotten this bad boy down from 4 hours, to 1 hour, to now…” (he did a little drumroll) “thirty seconds, folks! Thirty seconds, and you get all the benefits of a full night’s sleep! Just think about everything you could accomplish with that extra time. For myself…”


    Garret trailed off again. He tried to think about what, exactly, he had accomplished with the extra hour that the UnDreamer 3.0 had given him. Nothing came to mind. Of course, he’d only had it for a couple days. But time added up. That’s what he’d told himself when he got the NoSleep neurochip installed five years ago, back when they released the UnDreamer 1.0 and promised to cut his sleep time in half. Garret had been confident: those four extra hours per day were exactly what he needed to make it big. It was an investment. A $10,000 investment in his future. With an extra 1,460 working hours in the year, he’d make the money back in no time. Plus, NoSleep offered payment plans, and any sales Garret made through his affiliate link counted towards his loan principal. After he paid off the loan, sales would be pure profit. He hadn’t expected to still be paying five years later, but that was life: expensive. The neurochip needed software upgrades, and it only worked with the newest UnDreamer products, so what else was there to do other than add the costs to his loan principal and keep grinding?


    The problem, Garret scowled, was that the market was too damn saturated. Everyone and their grandma wanted to be rich. Every time you opened your phone, someone was selling you something. And here he was, selling something. Why would anyone listen to him? He could see himself on the screen: an average white guy, late twenties, round-faced, glasses, a smattering of acne, a patchy brown beard. A notification buzzed on his personal phone. Garret glanced at it, tapped, scrolled. A fit Asian guy wearing running shorts, bare-chested and sculpted, bounced on the balls of his feet as a motivational quote scrawled across the screen. Garret sighed and put the phone down. Tomorrow, he’d use his extra hour to go to the gym. If he was fit, he could be shirtless in his videos, and people would be more likely to buy from him. Maybe he could start selling fitness classes, or personal coaching. He could study how to eat healthy, and he could spend more time cooking. Hell, he could start a whole cooking channel and show people how to eat healthy and transform their lives.


    “We all have goals,” Garret told his 3 viewers. “We wanna be fit, and educated, and have creative hobbies, and spend time with friends, and make money doing our side hustles. But how do you fit it all in? You have to go to work, and once you’ve gone to work, you’re tired! Check it out — the UnDreamer 3.0 can solve that.”


    Garret unrolled the yoga mat and held it up to the camera. “Just look at that beauty. You can take it with you anywhere. Travel the world, working all day and partying all night — but getting all the benefits of 8 hours of sleep! I’ll be honest, y’all, I don’t know all the nitty gritty science behind how it works. The brainiacs at NoSleep sent me some stuff about REM cycles and neurochips and electrical signals that regulate the cortisol in your hypothalamus, and I’ll flash that on the screen for ya.” Here, Garret tapped a few buttons, split-screening his live stream so that viewers could see him on the top half, and his personal phone screen on the bottom half, which displayed a NoSleep infographic. He continued talking. “But ya’ll don’t care about that! You just wanna know that it works — and it works. Let me show y’all my favorite part.”


    Here, Garrett laid the UnDreamer 3.0 bed-mat behind him and held up the neurofiber pillowcase. “This thing, y’all, this thing is crazy. I can’t believe they’re bundling this bad boy with the bed for free. Check it out.” Garret opened the NoSleep app on his personal phone. “Obviously, you’ve got your standard neurodata — you know how sometimes you get so sucked into whatever you’re doing that you don’t realize you’re feeling off? Well, the app is constantly getting data from your NoSleep neurochip, and if your levels start to waver, it just sends you an alert, you lay down, then BAM, you’re back, baby. But these new features, the MemoryLock and DreamDecoder? Well, it’ll be easier if I just show you.”


    Garrett laid down and hit the “Rest Now” button on the app. He vaguely remembered sleep before the UnDreamer: the relief when racing thoughts slowed and he slipped into soothing nothingness, like wading out into a vast, cool lake. The UnDreamer 1.0 and 2.0 had plunged him into the waters of sleep, like a cliff diver leaping from the edge of awake into black nothing. But at least there had been nothingness. For the 30 seconds Garret laid on the UnDreamer 3.0, he was in perpetual free-fall, the gears of his mind whirring, buzzing, his body locked in place, and just as the watery nothingness rose to meet him, the timer buzzed, and Garret sat up.


    “Yah, baby! So, you can see all my levels are looking good, but here’s the best part. He pressed the “DreamDecoder” button, and a chart popped up with three columns: one for the date, one with a brief description of that night’s ‘dream’, and column labeled ‘interpretation’. He clicked into the description at the top of the chart.


    You are running very fast, but you are stuck in place. You pump your legs and arms harder and harder, but you cannot move. The ground is cracking. The cracks reach you. You fall.


    Garret laughed, awkwardly. He clicked on ‘interpretation.’


    Your life is collapsing around you, and you are doing nothing. You feel like you are doing a lot. You are doing nothing.


    Garret read it. “What the fuck does that mean?” he muttered. He felt uneasy. Garret did not enjoy self-reflection, and he especially did not enjoy some NoSleep AI chatbot reading him for filth while he live streamed to a shocking…1 person.


    “that sux bro” Eagleturd42 commented.


    “Yah,” Garret said. “It does.”


    The view counter dropped to zero as Eagleturd42 left the livestream.
    Garret ended the video feed. He felt an overwhelming, crushing sense of defeat. He had to go to work in four hours. He thought about going to the gym, or going to the grocery store and coming home and meal prepping something. He could film it. It could be the start of his big fitness journey. People love a transformation, Garret thought.


    He sat on the couch and turned on the TV. He didn’t feel like leaving the apartment. He didn’t want to have to work. He was tired. He turned up the volume on the TV, just loud enough to drown out the whirring in his mind. It was there: a persistent, irritating buzz. It was the buzz from the UnDreamer 3.0. He was sure the buzz was trying to tell him something. He didn’t want to listen. He turned up the volume again. He picked up his phone and opened Instagram. A thin, nerdy-looking white guy in a suit was holding a mic on stage. The audience was laughing. I’m funny, Garret thought. I could write stand-up comedy. I could sell out a whole stadium, I bet. I could get a Netflix special made about me, once I’m fit and my acne clears up. Acne always clears up when you eat healthy, he thought.


    With 15 minutes before he needed to leave for work, Garrett dressed in his khakis and a red polo. He laid down on the UnDreamer 3.0 and opened the NoSleep app. He pressed the “MemoryLock” button. A menu appeared.


    “Which time slots would you like to save to memory?” the app asked him. Descriptions of the past four hours were listed in 30-minute increments. Garrett didn’t need to read them to feel the disappointment rising like bile in his throat.


    He tapped two buttons: “Delete all.” “Rest now.”

    Thanks to Reedsy.com for providing the prompt that inspired this story! You can follow them at https://reedsy.com/creative-writing-prompts/.

    This story was written in response to: “Write about a character who wakes up in the middle of the night, or is unable to sleep.“ as part of What Keeps You Up at Night. It was the winner of the weekly prompts contest #372!

  • Housing is a Human Right

    Safe, stable, affordable housing was first recognized as a universal human right in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Although the US signed this declaration, there are still no federal laws that guarantee access to housing (unlike countries such as France, Spain, Sweden, and Belgium, whose constitutions expressly create a right to housing).

    As of 2022 in the U.S, there were an estimated 650,000 unhoused people and a projected housing shortfall of up to 7 million housing units. Only one in four eligible households receive federal housing assistance.  

    Under capitalism, housing is a commodity — one that corporations have increasingly begun to dominate as a means of exploiting the working class. A 2022 study by Drexel University of three major cities (Philadelphia, PA; Jacksonville, FL; and Richmond, VA) found that in the last 30 years, the proportion of rental properties owned by individuals (not LLCs) dropped from 77% to 41%. Investor purchases of single-family homes also increased, with more than 1 in 5 homes sold going from homeowners to investors in neighborhoods that were redlined under the Federal Housing Act of 1934.

    Why is this a problem?

     Corporations that own rental properties are not required to disclose beneficial owners. Because they are shielded from liability, corporate owners are incentivized to put profit over people and may not maintain their properties. In addition, corporations have the liquid capital to purchase properties and can easily absorb the cost of holding vacant and delapitated properties for long periods of time. This is how redlining and gentrification work. 

    In redlined areas, prospective buyers and current owners struggle to access mortgage financing, face low sale prices and high vacancy, and have higher shares of residents who are Black or Hispanic. Eventually, investors rennovate and resell or rent these properties at prices that are unnaffordable for the area’s original residents, leading to the increase in property value in the surrounding area and the displacement of individuals who are unable to afford the rising prices (gentrification). 

    Meanwhile, for the average family, homeownership is increasingly out of reach. The average cost of a home has risen from $18,000 in 1963 to $420,800 in 2024, whereas the median income for families in 1963 was $6,200 and as of 2024 the median income for families is $74,580. This number is lower for Hispanic ($62,800) and Black ($52,860) families. In percentage terms, in 1963 a family’s yearly salary was 34% of the cost of the home. Today, a family’s yearly salary is only 18% of the cost of the home. In the 1960s, rent was an average of $71 per month (meaning 14% of your monthly paycheck went to rent). Today, rent is an average of $1827 per month (meaning 29% of your monthly paycheck goes to rent).

    So what can be done?

    Imagine what the world would look like if the government devoted its $825 billion defense budget to creating low-cost housing units and offered subsidies and/or rent control for low-income groups. If the U.S. constitution contained an ammendment demanding acess to safe, sanitary housing for all. If homelessness was not treated as an individual problem, but a systemic one. Because in a country where 66% of people live paycheck to paycheck, homelessness is an ever-present danger for many.

    Although Congress denied the $300 billion “Housing as A Human Right Act” in 2020 and 2021, local legislation is still powerful. One notable example is California Senate Bill 567, i.e., the Homelessness Prevention Act, which went into effect on April 1, 2024. The bill caps rent hikes at 10% and prevents landlords from evicting tenants without legal cause. Another example is California Assembly Bill 12, i.e., the new residential security deposit law, which went into effect on July 1, 2024 and limits the amount landlords can charge for security deposits.

    Other steps that could be taken by the federal government include increasing protections for and expanding section 8 housing, introducing legislation requiring the disclosure of beneficial owners for LLCs and tracking high priced real estate transactions, and creating protections for tenants focused on just cause evictions and right to counsel for eviction. The government should also increase the tax rate on vacant properties, so that it is no longer profitable for corporations to hoard territory in a deliberate effort to delapitate and then gentrify urban areas.

    Sources:

    https://drexel.edu/nowak-lab/publications/reports/investor-home-purchases

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPUS

    https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/redlining

    https://www.pgpf.org/blog/2024/05/income-and-wealth-in-the-united-states-an-overview-of-recent-data

    https://natlawreview.com/article/californias-housing-overhaul-brings-significant-changes-landlords-and-tenants-2024

    https://housingmatters.urban.org/articles/naming-housing-human-right-first-step-solving-housing-crisis

  • Protect Public Libraries

    This is a love letter to libraries.

    Thank you for being a quiet place filled with books. There are so few quiet places where we can exist without paying — no need to buy a cup of coffee before I ask the librarian a question. Thank you for making learning look beautiful, with your dark oak bookshelves stretching up, and your little stools to reach the top shelf, and your endless rows of colorful spines stacked in neat columns like vertebrae. Thank you for being a place where everyone feels welcome. Thank you for being free, because knowledge should be free. Not everyone has a home with a computer and internet, but, because of you, everyone can have access to the opportunities those resources provide. 

    I wish everyone saw books as the treasure you do. If the Nazis had paused, and let their fingers caress the fraying edges and feel the thickness of the pages as their eyes lingered on the titles,  maybe they would never have burned the books. Maybe they would have read them and learned to think for themselves.

    I wish the people who are banning books today would read the books they claim to be so dangerous. I wish everyone had the courage of librarians, the ones who say: “Shhh, honey, we’re reading”. People make so much noise about what they don’t understand. Don’t they know you have to be quiet to read?

    I know times are hard. Stay a quiet place, please, full of worlds written for everyone.

    ****

    Libraries of all types receive only 0.003% of the federal budget, but their programs and services are used by more than 1.2 billion in-person patrons, and many more virtual visitors. They offer early literacy development and grade-level reading programs, summer reading programs for kids, high-speed internet access, employment assistance for job seekers, homework and research resources, veterans’ telehealth spaces, STEM programs, and small business support for entrepreneurs [1].

    On March 14 of this year (2025), Donald Trump issued an executive order that listed the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) as one of the governmental entities to be “eliminated to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law”, as part of his effort to “[continue] the reduction in the elements of the Federal bureaucracy that the President has determined unnecessary” [2].

    The IMLS distributes more than $200 million in grants nationwide [3]. Now that the Trump administration has frozen funding to the IMLS and placed the agency’s roughly 70 staff members on administrative leave, libraries across states are suffering. Although most libraries are funded by city and county governments, federal dollars help pay for summer reading programs, interlibrary loan services, and digital books. In 2023, more than 660 million people globally borrowed e-books, audiobooks, and digital magazines. Due to Trump’s funding freeze, that service is now in jeopardy; Cindy Hohl, president of the American Library Association (ALA), explained that “the cost of providing digital sources is too expensive for most libraries” [4].

    Libraries are also a cornerstone of the fight against book bans. The American Library Association has been pivotal in tracking data about banned and challenged books, as well as fighting back against these bans. When the U.S. Department of Defense Education Activity announced on February 7 that it would remove “books potentially related to gender ideology or discriminatory equity ideology topics” in DoD schools, the ALA released a statement stating that “the DoDEA is engaging in censorship of legitimate views and opinions that violates the First Amendment rights of those who serve our nation and their families, thereby denying them the very freedoms they have pledged to protect with their lives” [5].

    The U.S Supreme Court addressed the removal of library books from high school and junior high school libraries in the 1982 case Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District v. Pico. The Board of education of the Island Trees Union Free School District in New York had removed books from school libraries, characterizing them as “anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, and just plain filthy”, declaring “it is our duty, our moral obligation, to protect the children in our schools from this moral danger as surely as from physical and medical dangers” [6].The Court ultimately decided that “the special characteristics of the school library make that environment especially appropriate for the recognition of the First Amendment rights of students”, and that “local school boards may not remove books from school library shelves simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books and seek by their removal to “prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion” [6]. 

    In the Court’s decision, they reflected deeply on the importance of libraries to students. While they acknowledged the authority of school boards to choose a curriculum and academic materials, they also stated that students’ “selection of books…is entirely a matter of free choice; the libraries afford them an opportunity at self-education and individual enrichment that is wholly optional”, an opportunity that must be protected because “In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the school chooses to communicate” [6]. The Supreme Court cited the decision from one District Court, which stated that in the school library “a student can literally explore the unknown, and discover areas of interest and thought not covered by the prescribed curriculum. . . . Th[e] student learns that a library is a place to test or expand upon ideas presented to him, in or out of the classroom” [6]. 

    Since 2021, efforts to ban books have spiked; in 2020, 231 unique titles were challenged, while in 2021 this number jumped to 1,858. In 2022, a total of 2,571 unique titles were challenged, and in 2023 this number climbed even higher to 4,240 [7]. While this number decreased to 2,452 in 2024, the ALA states that this decrease may be the result of underreporting, censorship by exclusion, and legislative restrictions. Underreporting is when book challenges are not publicly reported in order to avoid risk to library workers’ professional livelihood and personal safety. Censorship by exclusion occurs when library workers are prohibited from purchasing books, often due to legislative restrictions, which are laws that require school districts to restrict or remove library materials broadly deemed to include “sexual content” or controversial themes — often resulting in the removal of books with LGBTQ+ characters or themes, as well as books about race or racism and featuring characters or color [8].

    A 2022 report by PEN America analyzed documented cases of book bans between June 2021 and July 2022 [9].  They found that 41% of banned or challenged books (674 titles) explicitly address LGBTQ+ themes or have LGBTQ+ characters. A total of 9% of these feature transgender characters or stories (145 titles). A total of 40% of banned book titles (659 total) contain prominent characters of color, and 21% of banned book titles directly address issues of race and racism.

    PEN America identified at least 50 groups operating at the national, state, or local levels, over 70% of which have formed since 2021 [9]. These groups are campaigning in an effort to control and limit the kinds of books that are available in schools. They use social media and inflammatory language like “grooming” and “pornography” to influence public perception; they circulate book lists to their audiences to challenge, flood school districts with official challenges, mobilize supports to attend board meetings, and even file criminal complaints against teachers, school district officials, and librarians. PEN directly linked 20% of the book bans enacted in the 2021-22 school year to these groups, and estimated an additional 30% of bans were the result of these groups’ likely influence, including the use of common language or tactics [9].

    A 2022 CBS news poll showed that Americans “overwhelmingly reject” banning books about history or race [10]. The movement to ban books is undemocratic. It imposes restrictions on all students based on the preferences of those seeking the bans. As Varian Johnson stated, “I think a parent can say, well, I don’t want my child to read this. I can respect that. But what gives you the right to bar all children from reading it? To bar all children from seeing a life that imitates theirs? It bars them from seeing someone who looks like them exist on the page and triumph over something…Anytime a book that features someone who looks like you is banned, it says that you’re not worthy. You don’t deserve to exist. You’re not as important as other things. Your life is not important. That’s wrong and it’s dangerous” [9].

    Books themselves are not dangerous. They are a tool for education, and they create space for conversations with young people about how to navigate the world. Adults must be willing to have those uncomfortable conversations, instead of denying young people the opportunity to become aware of ideas and worlds that are different from those in which they grew up. Libraries are one space in which those conversations can take place. We must protect the right of every young person to explore. We can start by protecting public libraries.

    [1] (ALA Responds to White House Assault on IMLS | American Libraries Magazine).

    [2] (Continuing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy – The White House).

    [3]  (What’s happening with the Institute of Museum and Library Services? | AP News).

    [4] (Libraries are cutting back on staff and services after Trump’s order to dismantle small agency | AP News)

    [5] https://www.ala.org/news/2025/02/ala-aasl-decry-us-defense-department-censorship-schools-and-libraries-military

    [6] https://www.thefire.org/supreme-court/board-education-island-trees-union-free-school-district-no-26-et-al-v-pico-his-next/opinions

    [7] https://www.ala.org/bbooks/censorship-numbers

    [8] https://www.ala.org/bbooks/book-ban-data

    [9] https://pen.org/report/banned-usa-growing-movement-to-censor-books-in-schools/

    [10] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/book-bans-opinion-poll-2022-02-22/